Firm Home · Legal Resources

Law Updates

Plain-English summaries of published court decisions we think California workers should know about. These are not Workplace Rights Advocacy case results—for the firm’s verdicts, settlements, and appellate work, see Case Results.

Summaries are for general education only—not legal advice—and do not capture every nuance in the underlying opinions.

Saberin v. Alation, Inc. (2026)

A published California Court of Appeal decision about when FEHA and Labor Code protections for arrests without conviction apply to remote workers outside California.

Read the full update →

Weiss v. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (2026)

The Ninth Circuit revived Title VII and FEHA religious-accommodation claims, holding that notice requires enough information to identify an actual religious conflict—not proof that the belief is valid.

Read the full update →

Adelanto Elementary School District v. Krause (2026)

A published California Court of Appeal decision about workplace violence restraining orders—and why employers cannot contract away the right to protect workers from harassment.

Read the full update →

Smith v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2026)

A published California Court of Appeal decision about FEHA race harassment claims and when many workers can join together in one lawsuit instead of filing separately.

Read the full update →

Decloedt v. Radnet Management, Inc. (2026)

A published California Court of Appeal decision about FEHA, sexual orientation harassment, and when workers can refuse forced arbitration.

Read the full update →

Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock (2026)

A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision about when workers can stay out of forced private arbitration and bring wage and employment claims in court instead.

Read the full update →

Husband v. Target Corporation (2026)

A California Court of Appeal decision about FEHA and mental disability—when employers must know about a disabling condition before accommodation duties attach.

Read the full update →